Thursday, November 6, 2008

Marshall v. Donovan, &C.

Marshall v. Donovan, &C., 73 Ky. 681 (Ky. App. 1874).

Marshall sued Donovan and Daum for the forcible seizure and conversion of a cow of the value of sixty dollars. They answered, and stated that Daum was the sheriff of Bracken County, that Donovan was his deputy, and that they seized and sold the cow to satisfy a tax-claim against Marshall arising out of a levy made pursuant to the provisions of an act of the General Assembly, approved March 11, 1873, entitled "An act for the benefit of the common schools in Bracken County."

The first section of said act provides "that in any common-school district in Bracken County in which the clearly ascertained will of the people shall be in favor of a district tax for the purpose of purchasing a site for a district school-house, of building a new school-house, of repairing an old one, or furnishing a school-house, or paying a debt that has been contracted for the purposes mentioned in this act, the levying of such a tax therein shall be lawful."

The second section provides that the will of the people, in any given district, shall be ascertained by the submission of the proposition to tax to "the white qualified voters thereof; and any widow or alien residing in any school-district who is a tax-payer, or who has children, within the ages fixed by the common-school laws, to be educated, shall be deemed a qualified voter."

The ninth section is in these words: "This act shall not apply to property owned by citizens of African descent."

The answer set out in detail the performance of every act essential under the law to authorize the imposition of the tax, and also the regularity of the steps taken by the sheriff and his deputy to enforce its collection.

Appellant filed a general demurrer to this answer; it was overruled; and the record shows that he admitted all the facts interposed by way of defense by standing by his demurrer, and that the court then dismissed his petition. He appeals, and insists that the act of March 11, 1873, is unconstitutional and void.

1. Because by the common-school laws of this commonwealth the negro is deprived "of his right to and interest in the school-funds of the state under the eleventh article of the state constitution."

2. Because the election provided for by the act is not "free and equal."

3. Because the property of citizens of African descent is not taxed as that of other citizens.

4. Because the state denies to persons within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

5. Because the act denies to citizens of African descent the right to vote on a question which concerns them as citizens, and thus violates the fifteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States.

We will not take up these propositions separately, preferring, as they are intimately connected the one with each and all the others, to treat them as subdivisions of the general proposition that the constitution of Kentucky has been so far modified by the adoption of the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth articles of amendment to the Federal constitution as to deprive the legislature of the power to maintain a system of common schools, under which moneys may be raised by the taxation of the property of the white inhabitants, and expended for the exclusive benefit of the white children of the commonwealth. If this proposition can be maintained, it results that our system of common schools as now organized is without constitutional sanction, and that the taxation annually levied and collected for school-purposes is so levied and collected without authority of law.

0 comments: